Chandru1849
Since you had many statements with authority about Namam etc I asked you a question. You have not answered it which leads me to think you have no answer to basic questions.
What are those basic questions?
You may be a knowledgeable person but reading your messages here and elsewhere make me conclude that your messages are rooted in ignorance. Your messages come across as looking to manufacture issues - silly posts about various Iyer subsects, diversity of Namams on the forehead, and starting a thread that had to be closed right away, total lack of understanding of what freedom of expression means to just name a few.
If you feel that discussing Iyer sub sects issilly, it is your outlook. I have mentioned several times in various posts thereason for knowing the sub sects of eminent personalities in Iyer community.Once again, I want to tell you that, being an Iyer, I am interested to know thesuccess level of Iyer in various sub sects. If you belong to Iyer community,tell me is it wrong? If not, it is not proper for you to raise such issues.
As told earlier, the message in the thread wasderived from some other thread. The name of the thread and the name of thegentlemen and their blogs were also furnished. Have you not seen? If themessages that are put in the thread new are not in good taste, the earlierthread containing such messages should have been blocked. There were so manycomments. Have you not noticed?
The requirements to become a member here are just to have a valid email address and an agreement to follow the basic rules of the forum. So members of any faith are welcome here from what I have witnessed..
Is it possible to become a member without avalid E-Mail address? I have a valid E-Mail address, and I think I am followingrules stipulated for this forum. Anyhow, I think you are overstepping.
Without revealing personally identifiable information (PII) it is good etiquette to declare if one is not of Hindu faith in a forum like this. If you are a Muslim or Christian or whatever else you will still be welcome by the members with open arms but no one likes Trojans.
Not clear. This does not pertain to me, since Iam not a non-Hindu. You should have known my background from my name itself.If not, I am helpless. There is no necessity to give false information.Don't assess others based on your outlook.
Based on your messages intending to divide (and did not succeed) I want you to know that your messages reflect those of a Trojan to me.
I presume the word "messages intending todivide" relates to Iyers and Iyengars. If so, my messages, which youimagine dividing in nature, were based on certain incidents happened during myemployment. I don't think Brahmins will blindly follow anything withoutapplying mind. You are underestimating Brahmins. If messages that reflectcertain facts are seen as Trojans by you, it is your outlook. I cannot help it.
I am against Trojans whether it is in software or in forums.
I gave my answer as above.
The ball is in your court on your own volitionto reveal your faith without revealing PII ..
By this time, you should have known my identity.If not, it is not my fault.
I should have ignored your post. To put an endto your further imaginations about me, I replied as above.
Good Night